Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM
| Maker | Canon |
| Model | EF 100mm f/2.0 USM |
| Fullframe Coverage | YES |
| Field of View
(degrees) Horizontal,Vertical, Diagonal Full Frame - 36x24mm APS-C - 22.5x15mm |
Full Frame : H - 20.4 : V - 13.7 : D - 24.4 APS-C : H - 12.8 : V - 8.6 : D - 15.4 |
| Focal Length Prime | 100 mm (APS-C 35mm equiv = 160 mm) |
| Aperture Range Prime | f2 - f22 |
| Motor | Ring USM |
| Elements/Groups | 8/6 |
| Diaphragm blades | 8 |
| Close Focus | 0.9 m : 3 ft |
| Maximum Magnification | 0.14x |
| Length/Diameter | 2.9"/2.9" : 73.7 mm / 73.7 mm |
| Weight | 16.2 oz : 460.1 gm |
| Filter | 58 |
| Lens Hood | ET-65III |
| LensPlay Rating | 8 - Good |
| User Rating # of ratings = 94 |
|
| Price (click for latest pricing) | $390 |
|
COMMENTS: An alternative to the 85/1.8 prime, the 100/2 is a very good portrait lens for full frame cameras. It's a bit of a toss up whether you prefer the look that a 100mm lens gives vs an 85. The 100/2 will give slighly more blurring to distant backgrounds and a slightly "flatter" perspective, but the 85 will give you a slightly shallower depth of field wide open. There's no clear cut "best" lens here and you can't go far wrong with either one. The 85/1.8 might be a touch sharper wide open, plus if you're shooting digital with an APS-C sensor and 85mm lens is already getting a bit long for portrait work and so may be preferred over the 100mm. The 85/1.8 is also slightly cheaper.
|
